The following text is copyright 1999 by Network World, permission is hearby given for reproduction, as long as attribution is given and this notice is included.

Reinforcing paranoia

by Scott Bradner

The saying goes "Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean they are not out to get you." Just about anyone remotely concerned with individual privacy is feeling justifiably paranoid these days.

Its been a while since there was much good news for anyone interested in privacy and most of the recent news keeps up this sorry trend.

Two weeks ago the FCC required telecommunications companies to support 6 of the 9 wiretapping powers that the FBI had requested. The FCC dropped the 3 powers that had the least impact on privacy.

( The FCC did delay imposing the same requirements on providers of IP telephony but given its track record you can expect those rules soon enough. The FBI praised the new rules as "going a long way to balance public safety, privacy and the needs of the telecommunications carriers." Easy to say if you just got everything you wanted.

The US Justice Department is asking Congress to give it the authority to break into your house to disable encryption systems in your PC.

A federal court just ruled that the ability of a telephone company to sell your calling records (who you called and for how long) to anyone they wanted is protected by the first amendment. In a too rare case the FCC is the good guy and was trying to restrict the practice.

Dutch Researcher Herman te Riele just announced that a message encrypted in a 512 bit RSA key was decrypted using a super computer and a flock of Internet-based workstations and yet the US government will not let you export technology to protect your privacy or corporate secrets that is anywhere near that strong. for a joke added a feature that lets its users see what books are popular with its customers on a per domain basis (e.g. what people at are buying) apparently with no thought given to the possibility that some people might see a privacy issue with the idea.

A possible ray of hope is the formation of the International Security, Trust, and Privacy Alliance ( but nowhere in their announcement is there talk of lobbying governments to protect the security and privacy of individuals.

If lamenting the lack of privacy protection in modern society seems like a recurring theme in this column it's because things continue to get worse. Internet pamphleteer Dave Farber frequently signs his email with a quote from Ben Franklin that expresses my worry. "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." But, in this interconnected world if you care so little for your essential liberty that you are willing to give it up, you are also giving up my liberty. And I rail against that.

disclaimer: Harvard has seen rails come and go the above one is mine.